Shahbudin: Najib, Rosmah’s bank accounts double trouble

Joe Fernandez

|

The Attorney General has to answer on the origin and nature of the funds that entered these accounts and their final destination.

律政司已就這一進入這些帳戶和他們的最終目的地資金的來源和性質回答。

納吉-羅斯瑪

吉隆坡總檢察長阿卜杜勒·加尼帕太證實，首相納吉有兩個銀行帳戶，在大馬銀行，後者的拒絕給出一個簡單的是或否的回答這個問題，再次占用了風頭，指出一個政治分析家。

此外，砂拉越報告以來公布的文件顯示，資金進入銀行帳戶羅斯瑪·曼梳，納吉的妻子，2月10日和今年4月23日之間。 「到目前為止，該文件顯示，200萬令吉。」

現在這已成為一個丈夫和妻子的緋聞，說Shahbudin胡辛。 「多年以來，這是吉隆坡和布城這是我們的驕傲。現在，我們必須採取的驕傲「這一可恥的丈夫和妻子對。」

納吉有兩個問題，一個已經回答了公司，分析師表示，即他是否已經或有銀行帳戶與大馬銀行私人銀行服務，所指稱的華爾街日報（WSJ）在一份報告上周五，而另一個問題是非常大筆的資金是否進入這些帳戶，由美國報紙的聲明。

「最初，當該公司表示，沒有任何的六個凍結的銀行帳戶屬於納吉，他的支持者都非常高興，並很快就指出怪手指華爾街日報」Shahbudin胡辛說。 「然後，他們陷入了沉默，當AG回來一天後，確認納吉確實有兩個帳戶，大馬銀行。他們沒有被凍結，因為他們在這個2013年8月30日和3月9日關閉。「

現在剩下，他補充說，華爾街日報稱是否非常大筆的資金進入這些帳戶。 「這是工作隊必須做的工作，並在調查結果公布。」

此外，他強調，問題就出來了：「為什麼這些帳戶關閉？」們這些帳戶也被關閉，以逃避追查製造（資金運動）難嗎？被這些帳戶關閉，因為資金被轉移到其他帳戶，投資，資金用完，或者他們被關在現金的地方？「

「這些問題是最有趣的，現在，該公司也證實，與納吉的封閉帳戶的文件已被扣押。」

在其他地方，這將是難以否認的砂拉越報告的細節非常清晰，完整。 「羅斯瑪似乎並沒有成為普通的家庭主婦所提出由她的助手至今。她從哪兒得到的資金，她的銀行帳戶存款？「

其他的問題出現，分析師表示：「這些老儲蓄或愛情從納吉的標誌？如果是後者，從哪裡納吉得到的金錢和他是怎麼獲得呢？或者說，是一個只有羅斯瑪知道其他地方的來源？「

Shahbudin預計羅斯瑪發出公開聲明在兩天宣布她「從來沒有花別人的錢，或者從PERMATA她領導的組織，這些錢是不是為她個人使用，如果她偷了錢，她也不會保持它在該國等等等等。「

分析師提醒，雖然專責小組，成員包括股份公司的錢伯斯，警察，國家銀行和馬來西亞反貪污委員會（MACC），以納吉報道犯罪嫌疑人，誰也總理兼財政部長，「他們是對人民負責和神「在這個問題上」。

「這意味著一切在這種情況下」。

重溫公眾的立場，即納吉應該去休假，而工作組進行調查，他指出，警方哈立德·阿布·巴卡爾·監察長一直比較感興趣的警告，那些誰泄露的信息將被處理。 「在IGP不直接向總理，但內政部長阿末扎希的報告，」Shahbudin說。 「關於緋聞哈立德的態度已經讓人擔心。」

「納吉應該去休假，因為他實際上是調查的對象。工作隊不能向他彙報。這將有沒有公信力，沒有合法性，「他說。 「重要的是，人民有信心，在整個調查過程和工作隊。」

KUALA LUMPUR: The issue that arises again in the wake of Attorney- General Abdul Gani Patail confirming that Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak had two bank accounts at AmBank and the latter’s refusal to give a simple Yes or No answer, is once again hogging the limelight, notes a political analyst.

Also, The Sarawak Report has since released documents showing that monies entered the bank account of Rosmah Mansor, Najib’s wife, between 10 February and 23 April this year. 「So far, the documents show RM2 million.」

This has now become a husband-and-wife scandal, said Shahbudin Husin. 「For years, it was the KLCC and Putrajaya which were our pride. Now, we have to take 『pride』 in this scandalous husband and wife pair.」

Najib had two issues and one has been answered by the AG, said the analyst i.e. whether he has or had bank accounts with AmBank private banking services, as alleged by the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) in a report last Friday; while the other question is whether extraordinarily large sums of monies entered these accounts, as stated by the American newspaper.

「Initially, when the AG said that none of the six frozen bank accounts belong to Najib, his supporters were very happy and were quick to point the fingers of blame at WSJ,」 said Shahbudin Husin. 「Then, they fell silent, when the AG came back a day later to confirm that Najib did indeed have two accounts with AmBank. They were not frozen because they were closed on 30 August 2013 and 9 March this year.」

Now what remains, he added, was whether extraordinarily large sums of monies entered these accounts as alleged by WSJ. 「This is where the Task Force has to do its work and make the findings public.」

Also, he stressed, questions arise: 「Why were these accounts closed?」 Were these accounts also closed in order to evade making tracing (movement of funds) difficult? Were these accounts closed because the funds were transferred to other accounts, invested, the funds exhausted, or are they being kept in cash somewhere?」

「These questions are among the most interesting ones now that the AG has also confirmed that documents relating to Najib’s closed accounts have been seized.」

Elsewhere, it will be difficult to deny The Sarawak Report as the details are very clear and complete. 「Rosmah doesn』t seem to be the ordinary housewife as presented by her aides so far. Where did she get the funds to deposit in her bank account?」

Other questions arise, said the analyst: 「Are these old savings or a sign of love from Najib? If the latter, from where did Najib get the monies and how did he secure them? Or, is the source from elsewhere which only Rosmah knows?」

Shahbudin expects Rosmah to issue a public statement in a day or two declaring that she 「never took the people’s money, or from Permata the organisation she heads, that the money is not for her personal use, that if she stole money she wouldn』t keep it in the country etc etc.」

The analyst reminded that although the Task Force comprising the AG’s Chambers, police, Bank Negara and the Malaysian Anti Corruption Commission (MACC) reports to Najib the suspect, who is also Prime Minister and Finance Minister, 「they are responsible to the people and God」 in the matter」.

「It means everything in this case.」

Revisiting the public position that Najib should go on leave while the Task Force carries out its investigation, he pointed out that Inspector General of Police Khalid Abu Bakar has been more interested in warning that those who leaked information would be dealt with. 「The IGP does not report directly to the Prime Minister but Home Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi,」 said Shahbudin. 「Khalid’s attitude on the scandal has people worried.」

「Najib should go on leave since he’s in fact the subject of investigation. The Task Force can』t be reporting to him. It will have no credibility and no legitimacy,」 he said. 「It’s important that the people have confidence in the whole investigative process and the Task Force.」

轉載請註明來源：今天頭條