敦馬女兒 瑪麗娜建議：「916 我們留在家， 遠遠觀賞 在死城一般的吉隆玻，有一群紅蕃在表演用磚塊砸頭的猴子戲！」
你們說，真箇建議好不好？當然好！！！
讓吉隆坡變成死城，那雞會被全世界笑死、全民痛斥、商家怒吼、老馬就可以趁勢連同巫統內反那雞的人進一步」馬殺雞「行動！
說不定 這是瑪麗娜跟她老爸之間的默契！
所以，呼籲全民合作，916留在家裡看猴子戲，等笑飽了，看看老馬會有什麼行動！戲 是越來越精彩了！
=====================================
《瑪麗娜：示威只為對抗‧「留在家看紅衫軍表演」》
（雪蘭莪‧八打靈再也10日訊）前首相敦馬哈迪女兒拿汀巴杜卡瑪麗娜倜侃，國民可以在916馬來西亞日當天待在家裡，觀賞「紅衫軍」所舉行的大集會和以磚塊敲頭的表演。
她揶揄，或許在馬來西亞日，國民可以待在家裡，遠遠的觀望「以磚塊敲頭」的表演，或出席更有趣的活動。
「他們可以自行攜帶食物，然後我們看看他們事後是否會收拾乾淨。」
建議改口號「弄虛作假」
她在《星報》撰文提到，這場被宣布為非法的集會將如期進行，而她本身絕對認同自由言論，無論怎樣卑劣，她都不會阻止任何人發表他們的看法。
現在的問題是她嘗試了解到底紅衫軍的立場是什麼，他們看起來所謂的示威並不是示威，只是為了對抗示威者，準確來說是凈選盟的示威者。
「我們清楚了解凈選盟的目的，但我們並不那麼了解紅衫軍「求戰心切」的做法。」
她以公平的假象方式指出，若紅衫軍集會是反凈選盟，那麼他們也是反對凈選盟集會裡20萬人的訴求。
「既然凈選盟要求的是公平和自由的選舉，那麼紅衫軍就是要求不公平和不自由的選舉，她建議他們的口號可以是「弄虛作假」（Stack the deck）。」
凈選盟第二訴求是乾淨的政府，相反地紅衫軍要求的就是「骯髒」的政府，即金錢決定施政方式包括政策和法律。
凈選盟第三個要求是希望當局採取行動拯救我國經濟，不至於讓我國淪為「發展最少的國家」，想當然紅衫軍肯定是不介意我國與其他貧窮國家處在同一水平線上。
「或他們希望到海外找工，就像我們的鄰國人民一樣。」
凈選盟也希望擁有發表異議的權利，她嘲諷紅衫軍，他們反對凈選盟的做法已經是擁有異議的權利，而她認為異議的意思是有多個詞彙，包括以「愚蠢」形容你不喜歡的人。
凈選盟證明集會可以和平
瑪麗娜在文中提到凈選盟4.0在和平的情況下結束，大馬人證明了國人可以因為共同的目標並能和平地完成這項目標，再也沒有人可以說超過五個人的集會就是會造成混亂或暴力。
她說，在全球40個城市當中，身在海外的大馬人民都因為凈選盟集會而聚集在一起，集會當兒並沒有發生任何意外。這顯示示威中所發生的暴力事件並不是因為示威者，而是因為催淚彈和水炮，這次國人必須讚揚警方終於意識到這個簡單的事實。
===============================
《Protest not for protest’s sake》
On Malaysia Day, let’s leave the Red Shirts to do their business.
ON Aug 29, Malaysians proved something very important – that it is possible to come together in common cause and do it peacefully. No more can we believe anyone who says that any gathering of more than five people is bound to be disorderly and violent.
Bersih 4 proved that people can be disciplined and orderly in big crowds. They obeyed instructions not to breach the barriers at Dataran Merdeka and they cleaned up afterwards.
In between they marched, they put up posters to express their feelings about current issues, they made and listened to speeches, they sang, they camped out and they ate. And they did all this peacefully, in great camaraderie with one another.
This time, I could not be in the country to join my fellow citizens in protest. Instead, I joined some 1,000 Malaysians in London on the same day to demonstrate for the same cause.
We started off in front of our High Commission where people held up banners and posters and listened to a few speeches, waved at High Commission officials and then walked to Whitehall where we stopped near Downing Street, before ending up at Trafalgar Square where we sang NegaraKu in the rain.
There were only two policemen watching over us, which again proved that we don』t need a big police presence to ensure that we behaved.
In some 40 cities all over the world, Malaysians gathered for Bersih, all without incident. It just goes to show that violence at protests are not caused by protesters but by the use of tear gas and water cannons. We have to commend the police for realising this simple fact this time.
Now, there is talk of a counter-rally, which has already been declared illegal but which insists, like Bersih, to carry on anyway. I am all for freedom of speech so generally, no matter how despicable, I would not stop anyone from expressing their opinions.
The trouble is I have a problem trying to figure out what the so-called Red Shirts stand for. They seem to want to protest for the sake of protesting against protesters, specifically Bersih protesters. But while we are clear about the issues that Bersih espouses, we don』t really know what the Red Shirts are spoiling for a fight for.
I suppose it’s fair to assume that since the Red Shirt rally is anti-Bersih, then they must want all the opposite of whatever Bersih’s 200,000 participants want. Let’s look at what these are:
Bersih wants free and fair elections. I suppose the Red Shirts must therefore want unfree and unfair elections, possibly the only way any of them can hold any public position. If they were fluent in English, I would recommend their slogan be 「Stack the Deck」.
Secondly, Bersih 4 is demanding for a clean government. It must therefore mean that the Red Shirts are demanding for a dirty government, one in which money decides everything from whoever gets to govern to what policies and laws are made. I wonder how many Reds actually think they will have a say in any government policies, given that few of them are likely to be millionaires. Millionaires don』t need BR1M.
Speaking of which, Bersih 4’s third demand is for action to save our economy. As our ringgit plummets to depths never seen before and everything becomes extremely expensive for us, obviously we need to see concrete moves being taken to ensure that we don』t become relegated to 「least developed country」 status.
But since the Red Shirts are taking issue with Bersih, I must assume that they won』t mind if our country descends to a level at par with some of the poorest countries in the world. Maybe they hope to go abroad to find work like some of our neighbours.
Fourthly, Bersih 4 is demanding for the right to dissent. This means the right to disagree, respectfully, with anyone, including the Government. Since the Red Shirts are already exercising their right to disagree with Bersih, they really should not have any problems with this demand. However, I do think that the right to dissent means having a vocabulary that contains more than one word – 「stupid」 – to describe those you don』t like.
So, on Sept 16, the Red Shirts would like to emulate Bersih by having their own 「illegal」 rally on a day meant to celebrate our unity in diversity. I don』t know how the Reds intend to express diversity since thus far they have looked monoracial and monogendered. And unity with yourself doesn』t really count for much.
Perhaps on Malaysia Day, we should all just stay home and watch the breaking-bricks-with-your-head display from afar. Or attend other fun events elsewhere. They can bring their own food and drink from home. And let’s see if they』ll clean up afterwards.
文章來源: https://www.twgreatdaily.com/cat98/node598057
轉載請註明來源：今天頭條