
文告:新四子入稟法庭捍衛言論自由!
新青年四子—— 陳家銪,劉立揚,蔡勤治,何子揚入稟法院提出司法檢討,今天正式向法庭申請准令。
去年10月,由馬大學生事務處、學生代表理事會以及國家特別事務局通訊與多媒體部(JASA)聯合舉辦的1MDB講座。從一開始未經由會議商討通過,校陣學生代表理事會主席擅自同意與校方和國家特別事務局通訊與多媒體部(JASA)聯手合作進行 1MDB 座談會,邀請一馬公司貪污醜聞的要角-阿魯甘達成為唯一的主講人,使活動成為1MDB 醜聞漂白與洗腦大會。
新青年四子不滿校方一再地利用大學校園,為納吉政權背書,試圖合理化、合法化與合情化一馬公司醜聞,因而在當天活動問答環節結束後舉牌抗議。新青年四子被校方判處嚴厲警告和總罰款上千令吉。在進行上訴後,新青年四子的罰款被撤回,然而仍然被判有罪和給予嚴厲警告,換言之上訴仍是以失敗告終。
四名學生最終決定採取法律行動挑戰校方的判決!
同時, 也藉由提告校方的舉動向校方宣示:大學生拒絕官校相護,抗議校方淪為國陣政府的馬前卒,一起鉗制大學生的反對權利!
我們堅信 「大學生是時代的眼睛,社會的良心」。
因此,四名馬大生正式向法庭申請司法檢討,抗議馬大校方違反聯邦憲法賦予的權利,並堅持抗議一馬貪污醜聞。

Last October, the UM Students』 Representative Council (MPPUM), Student Affairs & Alumni Division (HEPA) and Department of Special Affairs (Jasa) organized a 1MDB town hall forum in Universiti Malaya. It started off by an arbitrary decision by the President of MPPUM, Hazwan Syafiq in collaboration with the Student Affairs Department to organize the 1MDB town hall event without any discussion or meeting with the members of MPPUM beforehand.
The speaker was Arul Kanda Kandasamy, the president and executive director of 1MDB, making the town hall event a brainwashing session.
UMANY were dissatisfied with how the university had been repeatedly used by the BN government to rationalize and legalize any wrongdoing of the infamous 1MDB scandal, the largest of all kind in our history.
Therefore, 4 UMANY representatives (UMANY4) held placards after the Q&A session as a means to protest the scandal and were later charged by the university. UMANY4 were found guilty and punished with stern warnings and fines of RM150 to RM600 by the university on first proceeding. After appealing, the fines were revoked but the students were still found guilty with stern warnings. In other words, the appeals were actually not successful.
Dissatisfied with the guilty verdict, UMANY4 have now decided to take legal action against the university that infringed basic democratic rights of the students. At the same time, we hope to convey a message to UM that 「University Students rejects to be the subject of suppression」 and the 「University should not be used as a pawn to fulfill whatever interest of the ruling regime」. Hence, 4 UM students are now officially filing a judicial review to challenge the university’s verdict in which they had completely defied freedom of expression that is guaranteed by the Federal Constitution.
轉載請註明來源:今天頭條