巫裔人權女律師西蒂卡欣:我絕不後悔比中指!那些伊斯蘭流氓和被嚴重洗腦的白痴混蛋,只配吃我的中指!

張無忌| 2016-09-07| 檢舉

巫裔人權女律師西蒂卡欣:我絕不後悔比中指!那些伊斯蘭流氓和被嚴重洗腦的白痴混蛋,只配吃我的中指!

文:張丹楓

西蒂卡欣宣稱,她過去出席過很多論壇,無論是政治的、時事的、宗教的還是法律的,出席者也主講者都很理智,都懂得彼此尊重。

「I have been to so many forums. I have asked hard-hitting questions but never in my wildest dreams (did I think) that someday I will show a finger in a forum to the audience,」 she wrote last night.

「I don』t regret it one bit. To me, those Islamist hooligans deserve the finger and more.

「Crass? Rude? Since when a woman cannot be crass and rude in the face of hooligans and brainwashed morons?」

但是星期一晚上這場有關伊斯蘭刑事法的講座會,卻明顯吸引了非常低層次的觀眾來,而主講者之一的伊斯蘭黨總秘書拿督達基尤丁顯然也是故意提供現場觀眾錯誤的訊息,故意扭曲了真正的伊斯蘭教義!她說。

看到現場那些非常低層次的伊斯蘭流氓,他們對伊斯蘭教義根本只是一知半解,卻又強迫別人必須遵從他們的理論,如果提出跟他們不同的見解就會被攻擊,被他們羞辱。像這樣的伊斯蘭流氓,何必對他們客氣?

西蒂卡欣說,對文明人,她會用文明的方式跟他們交流;但是面對這些沒有獨立思考能力,被嚴重洗腦的白痴混蛋Moron,我覺得最好的方式就是給他們看中指:嗱!

星期一晚上,西蒂卡欣在論壇上,因為不滿伊黨一意孤行地準備落實伊刑法,怒嗆在場的伊黨總秘書拿督達基尤丁。

西蒂卡欣在問答環節提出自己對伊刑法的看法時,不斷受到其他觀眾干擾,一度叫打岔者「閉嘴」!

「我是一名馬來人,也是一名穆斯林,為何要被你們這些人控制。這是我跟上蒼之間的事,為何我必須根據你們所謂的伊斯蘭。

【落實伊刑法 】討論會花絮

主講人達基尤丁(左起)丶加米基爾丶陳勝堯及顏炳壽辨論「修改355條文,實事與觀感"主題。

(雪蘭莪·沙亞南5日訊)首相署部長拿督斯里加米基爾強調,巫統同意讓伊斯蘭黨主席拿督斯里哈迪阿旺向國會提呈私人法案修改355法令,並不是掉入伊黨陷阱,同時保證修改相關條文絕對不是落實伊刑法的「後門」。

他說,355法令只是國會賦予伊斯蘭法庭判處罪成者的權力,至於伊斯蘭事務,包括伊刑法都歸州屬權力,因此兩者不能混為一談。

「355法令原本就存在,我們並沒要擴大伊庭在其它罪案的權力,只是增加監禁丶罰款及鞭笞的數目,但是很多人,尤其非穆斯林都誤解了。」

他舉例,很多人刻板印象是砍手,但是在伊刑法中,砍手是偷竊和打搶的懲罰,但是偷竊和打搶在我國卻是屬於普通法庭的權限。

加米基爾今午出席「修改355法令,實事與觀感」論壇時指出,國會修改355法令並非首例,早在1984年便從最高1000令吉和監禁6個月刑罰,增加至最高5000令吉丶監禁3年及鞭笞6下,但當年修改並沒有問題。

詢及身為穆斯林是否必須支持修改這項法令時,他認為這是必須的。

達基尤丁:非伊黨說了算

伊斯蘭黨總秘書拿督達基尤丁指出,伊黨提呈私人法案修改355法令,全是依據法律程序,他認為一切都是很正常,更何況並非是要落實伊刑法。

「一旦提呈國會,大家也可以公開辯論,並不是由伊黨說了算。」

陳勝堯:沒明確講解內容

行動黨甲洞區國會議員陳勝堯認為,政府和伊黨沒有明確講解法案內容,也沒明確撇清與伊刑法的關係,加上社交網體火速宣染這項課題,因此難免會影響民眾的觀感。

「不只是非穆斯林,這項課題也對穆斯林影響深遠,因此有必要清清楚楚。」

陳勝堯在論壇後,被詢及行動黨是否願意與伊黨針對此事,好好坐下來商討時,他表示必須先看過法案內容,才能決定。

顏炳壽:擔心有隱議程

另外,馬華伊斯蘭法律與政策專案組主任顏炳壽則指出,馬華和非穆斯林的擔擾並非空穴來風,因為他曾於2014年5月查閱過大馬伊斯蘭發展局(JAKIM)的報告,該報告計劃分成兩個階段在大馬落實伊刑法,第一個階段便是修改355條文。

「而且,巫統並沒在內閣會議或國陣最高理事會中討論此事,讓人擔心有隱議程,巫統或掉入伊黨的陷阱。」

人權律師怒嗆伊黨總秘書

巫裔人權女律師西蒂卡欣在論壇上,不滿伊黨一意孤行地準備落實伊刑法,怒嗆在場的伊黨總秘書拿督達基尤丁。

西蒂卡欣在問答環節提出自己對伊刑法的看法時,不斷受到其他觀眾干擾,一度叫打岔者「閉嘴」!

「我是一名馬來人,也是一名穆斯林,為何要被你們這些人控制。這是我跟上蒼之間的事,為何我必須根據你們所謂的伊斯蘭。」

當她準備再說下去時,背後不斷有人在叫囂,結果她轉身向干擾者比出中指。

【落實伊刑法 】討論會花絮

I don』t regret it one bit,』 says Siti Kasim

Lawyer who made insulting gesture at forum insists the proposed amendments to Act 355 seek to confer shariah courts with 「unlimited power to impose all other hudud punishments」.

PETALING JAYA: Controversial lawyer-cum-activist Siti Kasim does not regret showing her middle finger to those who attended Monday’s forum on the Shariah Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act 1965 (Act 355).

Taking the matter to Facebook, Siti said the forum on 「Pindaan Akta 355: Antara Realiti Dan Persepsi」 (「Act 355 Amendment: Between Reality and Perception」) was filled with 「Islamist hooligans」 and 「brainwashed morons」 – those who deserved to be shown the finger.

She also said that unlike other forums she had been to, the one organised by Karangkraf Group was attended by those who believed they were upholding God’s laws and, hence, couldn』t accept a dissenting voice like hers.

「I have been to so many forums. I have asked hard-hitting questions but never in my wildest dreams (did I think) that someday I will show a finger in a forum to the audience,」 she wrote last night.

「I don』t regret it one bit. To me, those Islamist hooligans deserve the finger and more.

「Crass? Rude? Since when a woman cannot be crass and rude in the face of hooligans and brainwashed morons?」

She then pointed out that one of the speakers present, PAS Secretary-General Takiyuddin Hassan, had misled the audience while explaining the proposed amendments to Act 355.

「The speakers from PAS and Umno insisted it is not a hudud bill. Of course, it is not a hudud bill, but it has everything to do with hudud.」

She said without this amendment regarding the punishment allowed for shariah courts, PAS wouldn』t be able to mete out the punishment already stated in their hudud enactment.

Takiyuddin and Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Jamil Khir Baharom had denied that this is the case, saying the amendments are meant to increase the powers of shariah courts in regards to offences already provided in the 1965 Act.

Siti, however, claimed that the Private Member’s Bill brought to Parliament by PAS President Abdul Hadi Awang, sought to confer shariah courts with 「unlimited power to impose all other hudud punishments」.

These hudud offences include offences like zina (adultery), qazaf (false accusation of committing zina), syrub (alcohol consumption) and irtidad or riddah (apostasy) and according to the Kelantan Shariah Criminal Code (II) (1993) 2015 Enactment, punishment for these is whipping, ranging from 40 to 100 lashes, she said.

「The Bill also seeks to substitute the existing Section 2 in Act 355 with a new section that appears to widen the scope of the shariah court’s existing criminal jurisdiction, which is currently limited to offences by Muslims against Islam,」 Siti alleged.

To those who questioned her objection to the Islamic laws, Siti said she did so as they weren』t God’s laws.

She also said that Malays and Muslims must be allowed to discuss the set punishments and proposed that they be given the choice to either be governed under the secular laws or religious laws.

「I refuse to be governed by these man-made laws under the pretext of Islam. These people are selling Islam. We have been duped for so long.

「I am fearful that these mullahs are taking me away from the true Islam. The Islam that I know is beautiful and full of compassion.」

Siti said these hardliners were not easy to convince due to the complete brainwashing by their mullahs.

They keep saying why we want to stop them from practising their beliefs, she said.

「Those Malays who do not want to be governed under these man-made religious laws, should be allowed to opt out.」

Siti said she would never submit to these man-made laws disguised under the cloak of Islam.

文章來源: https://www.twgreatdaily.com/cat98/node1249685

轉載請註明來源:今天頭條