自從中國殲20戰鬥機登場以後，很多人對於這個戰鬥機的實力也是比較的關注，不管是國內還是國外的人都在討論殲20的對比，而作為鄰國的印度，也在對比中國的殲20。

LAC「光輝」輕型戰機：美國發動機、法國外形、以色列航電和英國雷達等組裝出來的"國產"的戰機。和「阿瓊」坦克;印度國產航母並稱為印度軍工的」搞笑海陸空。雖然我不想嘲笑付出了孜孜不倦的努力的三哥，但是目前仍舊沒有列裝(一說列裝一個中隊)的「光輝」戰機到底性能如何，不得而知。

殲-20採用了單座、雙發、全動雙垂尾、DSI鼓包式進氣道、上反鴨翼帶尖拱邊條的鴨式氣動布局。機頭、機身呈菱形，垂直尾翼向外傾斜，起落架艙門為鋸齒邊設計，機身以高亮銀灰色塗裝（原型機為深墨色）。側彈艙採用創新結構，可將飛彈發射掛架預先封閉於外側，同時配備中國國內最先進的新型空空飛彈。

Karthik Duraisamy (San Francisco)

1 hr ago (08:22 AM)

How can China be the 2nd country after US to have test flown the Stealth Fighter when India/Russia have already test flown 40 times T-50 as of November 2010. I don't think it makes sense !!!

中國怎麼能是世界上除了美國之外第二個實驗隱形飛機的呢?印度和俄羅斯在2010年11月就試飛T-50，40多次，我真的很不理解

Rapter (Washington)

5 hrs ago (11:04 PM)

Doing something on paper is much easier than making actual product - be it Amazon Kindle, Apple iPhone, Cisco 12k router, or moon orbiter, stealth fighter jet, or Boeing 777s... On paper, about 35 nations could have these, but in reality one very few could deliver these products. This is called manfacturing not call centers! A stealth jet need so many component that India can simply not produce. For China, it has its own indigenous jet engine (meaning they own all the design), but it still has trouble with the craftmanship of producing a durable engine. Think about this, Lexus or BMW are widely available, but how many countries could emulate them into production ? No,Tata Nano is not innovation.

紙上談兵比真正的作出東西來容易多了，比如Amazon Kindle, IPHONE, 思科路由器，登月衛星，隱形戰機，波音777等等。有35個

國家曾經在紙面上提出來類似技術水平的設計。但是實際上只有少數的幾個國家能生產這樣的東西。這就是製造業的威力，電話服務中心不會能製造任何東西。一架隱形戰機需要很多的零件，大部分的零件印度都不能生產。對於中國，他們擁有自己的設計的發動機，儘管發動機的耐用性還有問題。這樣想，凌志和寶馬車到處都能買到，但是有幾個國家真正的能仿造出來呢，不，塔塔的納米車根本不是創新。

sahajpal (delhi) replies to Rapter

3 hrs ago (12:26 AM)

This so called stealth fighter is nothing but a large version of J 10 with angles and painted it black you call itinnovation As per experts is the armament and radar are not stealhy at all.china has been known to steal most of the technology from west. several chinese spies have been arrested for stealing various tehnologies ,there isnothing innovatve, its the same as manufaturing products from prefabficated moulds provided by walmart andlabeling it made in china.Like the J10 was a copy of israeli AL lavi And the engine is Russian AL31fn turbofan.This all stolen or borrowed technology.

所謂的隱形戰機根本就是一個放大版本的J10，然後塗上黑漆。這樣就拉出來說是創新而且它根本就不隱形。中國在偷取西方技術的上是臭名昭著的。很多的中國間諜都因為這個被抓起來了。這根本就不是創新。這就像是根據Walmart提供的圖紙生產產品然後標上「中國製造」一樣。J10簡直就是一以色列戰機的翻版，發動機還是用的俄羅斯的AL31fn渦扇。他們全是偷竊或者「借取」的技術

RAPTER replies to sahajpal

31 mins ago (03:33 AM)

I guess India didn't deliberately fail its geo-sync saterlite lunch last month. It HAD trouble making it work,right ?! Even as the rocket uses Russian made 3rd stage booster, India didn't copy the Russian 1st stage designcorrectly to reach the 3rd stage, LOL.

我想印度沒有故意的讓上個月的火箭發射失敗的吧。火箭確實有問題，對吧。儘管第三級火箭使用了俄羅斯的發動機，但是印度沒有成功的拷貝俄羅斯第一級火箭發動機的設計，所以根本沒有達到第三級。大笑

Rapter replies to sahajpal

2 hrs ago (01:55 AM)

And India can make all these ? Where do you buy a DSL modem in India today ?! or any cell phones ? Talk aboutIndia being the most innovative nation on earth, at lease make something even by copying.

另外印度製造了所有的零部件麼?在印度，你在哪裡買上網用的貓呢?或者手機。印度想成為最具有創新性的國家，先翻版一些東西再說。

sahajpal replies to Rapter

1 hr ago (02:33 AM)

chinese are dumping the imitated garbage all over the world.India is a resilient country with transparencycompared to china.Our biggest handicap is the goverance .We have enough talent to compete and excel given theright envoirment.India is rapidly developing its infrastructure, soon those prefabricated moulds will shift fromchina to india. currently chinese per capitais $300/mo to india,s $ 100/mo so it will be cheaper to manufacturegoods in India than china

中國正在向全世界傾銷他們的垃圾。印度是一個有毅力的國家。跟中國比，我們的政府更加透明。我們最大的問題是政府執行力。我們有足夠的人力資源來達到世界的巔峰，如果各種條件都配合的話。印度的基礎設施正在飛速發展。很快所有的那些預測模型就要從中國轉移到印度了。現在中國的人均GDP是300/mo，而印度是100/mo。所以在印度生產東西會比在中國便宜。

Badabing (USA) replies to sahajpal

37 mins ago (03:27 AM)

Sahajpal, okay India's biggest hindrance is the lack of capable governance, per cap is way lower than China. Youare leaving out skilled and willful labor force; super productive on the line resources. Indian labor productivityis not all that. Just because labor is cheaper does not mean it's a true competitive edge. You pride yourself ontransparency? Even if it is really transparent you wouldn't like what you'll see. You wish you have the imitatedgarbage to dump off to the rest of the World; it's called market segmentation. You can cowl inside your cellophanehut and stroke yourself to delirium but it won't change the fact that as the World's Largest Democracy, Indiacontinues to put Nehru and Gandhi clan members into office to continue the agony. Will of the people you say? Or ageneral lack of the sense of calling? I bet you if you put the Chinese work force under Indian governance, it'llstill out perform your current one; there might even be a brand new government in place afterwards too.

樓上的哥們，印度的最大問題確實是確實執行力，人均國民生產總值比中國低的多。你沒有考慮勞動力量的差別。中國有勤勞的經過良好培訓的勞動力量，他們在生產線上效率特別高。印度人差遠了。印度工資便宜並不代表最終產品便宜。你以印度的透明度自豪?如果真的是透明的，那你也會不喜歡的。你希望中國不傾銷垃圾商品?這叫市場競爭力。你可以鑽入自己的小世界，不管外面。但是你不能否認這個事實：最為實際上最大的民主國家，印度的尼赫魯和甘地家族一直把持著政治。人民的工作的意願， 我打賭如果讓印度政府來管理中國人民，他們依然會比現在的印度人民好多了。更不用說，現在的印度政府在中國早被推翻了。

轉載請註明來源：今天頭條