夠力咯夠力咯！這次納吉和阿班底踢到鐵板咯！沙烏地阿拉伯的財政部及外交部今天強烈否認他們《曾經捐款26億給馬來西亞首相納吉》！
沙烏地阿拉伯財政部及外交部同時發表聲明，表示對《納吉宣稱沙地王室捐款6.81億美元給他》的說法存疑，並且聲明財政部及外交部《毫不知情》。對於阿班底所說《已經歸還20億獻金給沙烏地阿拉伯金主》的說法，更直接否認《沒有這回事》！
這等於又一次打臉納吉、打臉阿班底、也同時打臉整個馬來西亞，國家顏面再一次被踩在人家的腳底了。
沙烏地阿拉伯的君主專制國家，從國王到首相、各軍政部門首長全部由王室成員擔任。因此若沙地國王真有捐獻26億給納吉，這些王室成員的部長不可能不知情。
因此，就算有人宣稱這筆捐款來自已故沙地國王阿都拉，企圖以《死無對證》方式自圓其說，也完全經不起事實考驗。
大家不妨回頭看看納吉和他的哈巴狗阿班底的說法，然後一條條的列出他的罪狀。
首先，納吉表示他私人戶口那來歷不明的26億是來自中東的政治獻金。
就算真的是政治獻金，為什麼不是存入巫統的賬戶？而是存進私人戶口？這明顯已經觸犯大馬防範貪污法令！
接著納吉改口說，中東的這筆獻金是為了表揚馬來西亞對抗伊斯蘭國IS的努力和貢獻。
問題是，大家都還記得納吉曾經公開表揚伊斯蘭國IS，要求巫統黨員學習IS的聖戰精神哦。馬來西亞過去3年在對抗IS方面的《努力》基本是零！在對抗IS的努力方面，印尼和新加坡就表現得比馬來西亞積極得多，而且有效得多了，為什麼那中東的冤大頭不把數十億的獻金捐給印尼和新加坡？偏偏捐給毫無貢獻的馬來西亞？而且指明只給納吉私人？是想騙鬼？還是想騙豬？
然後納吉大舉對付調查這貪污事件的政府高官顯要，不是收編就是撤職、甚至《莫名其妙》死於非命。
如果不是他心中有鬼，為什麼不敢坦然接受調查？反而將所有調查的高官都撤職、調職、強逼退休？一副《誰敢調查我誰就死》的醜惡嘴臉？
然後，納吉自己又說，中東王室給他這筆政治獻金是要助他在2013年的大選勝選。
哦，這豈不是《鬼拍後尾枕》自己爆料承認2013年全國大選是他通過賄選才勝利的嗎？如果沒有這些政治獻金讓他賄賂選民買選票，國陣早就落選失去執政權了，他的意思就是這樣嗎？
現在他的哈巴狗阿班底又說，納吉只是使用了其中5千多萬獻金，剩下的已經悉數歸還中東的捐獻者。
這又產生了三個大問題，阿班底又一次幫納吉挖了三個深不見底的大洞，小心自己站不穩掉下去屍骨無存！
其一：如果這筆26獻金是沒有問題的、合法的、拿得心安理得，那為什麼又要歸還呢？這不就說明這筆《獻金》真的是很骯髒的，見不得光的嗎？就是因為見不得光，所以才急著歸還原主嗎？
其二：既然是見不得光的骯髒錢，納吉居然已經用掉其中5千多萬。這不是明顯犯了重罪嗎？就像比如一個人去銀行偷了100萬，被發現的時候已經用掉了10萬；他把剩下的90萬歸還銀行，就可以當作什麼事都沒發生過嗎？就可以算無罪了嗎？阿班底，你自己比豬還笨就好，別把全馬3000萬人民、包括小孩和甘榜沒讀書的老人都當成跟你一樣比豬還笨。
其三：納吉說這錢是來自沙烏地阿拉伯已故國王阿都拉的捐獻。阿都拉去年就去見真主阿拉，享受著72個處女了；一個死人的戶口早就關掉了，你說你把20多億都還給了死人；難道你要阿都拉國王從真主那裡暫時停止享受淫樂回到地面上來幫你作證嗎？這不是擺明著是在亂編故事，來個《死無對證》嗎？
有一句世界名言這麼說：你說了一次謊言，就需要另外製造10個謊言幫你圓謊。現在納吉製造出來的謊言，恐怕沒有一千個也有八百個了，看來他需要更多更多的新謊言來掩蓋這些將給小孩聽小孩會笑死、講給鬼聽鬼會笑到死多一次的低劣謊言。最後他一定會被這些數不盡的謊言淹死。
看看沙烏地阿拉伯的官方站出來澄清，說明實際上根本就沒有26億捐款這回事，這可是沙地官方第一次站出來公開掌摑納吉。
說穿了，這26億從哪裡來？全國3000萬人民都懂：從馬來西亞的國庫搬出去的啦！是一個大馬公司假借投資之名，從大馬國庫搬到中東轉一個圈，就進了納吉的私人賬戶咯。這麼淺顯的道理，全國人民都懂，就只有納吉羅斯瑪和阿班底三個人認為大馬人民還不懂罷了。
Saudi Arabia’s finance and foreign affairs ministries are in the dark about the supposed donation from the Saudi royal family to Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak.
According to The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) today, the two ministries have declined to comment on attorney-general Mohd Apandi Ali's statement yesterday, but said they have no information about such a donation, which would have been unprecedented.
「A Saudi government official, while declining to comment specifically on the prosecutor’s statement, said the Saudi ministries of foreign affairs and finance had no information about such a gift and that a royal donation to the personal bank account of a foreign leader would be unprecedented.
「Representatives of the royal family couldn』t be reached for comment,」 the WSJ report says.
Separately, the BBC quoted an unnamed source claiming that the money came from Abdullah, to help Najib win the 2013 general election.
It said the source, who is reportedly well-placed and has requested anonymity, claimed that the money was drawn from Abdullah's personal finances, as well as state coffers.
「The purpose of the donation was simple, said the Saudi source - it was to help Mr Najib and his coalition win the election, employing a strategic communications team with international experience, focusing on the province of Sarawak, and funding social programmes through party campaigning.
「But why should the Saudis care about an election in a non-Arab country more than 6,000km (3,700 miles) away? The answer, the source said, lay in their concerns over the rising power of the Muslim Brotherhood, which they consider a terrorist organisation.
「The Saudis were already upset at events in Egypt, where President Mohammed Morsi was busy consolidating the Brotherhood's hold on the country,」 the report said.
The report explained that the opposition alliance at the time, Pakatan Rakyat, included PAS, whose founders were inspired by the Muslim Brotherhood.
It noted that this was despite there is little evidence that the brotherhood has much support in Malaysia.
'International investigators don't believe'
Yesterday, Apandi cleared Najib of corruption, basing his decision on the investigation by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC).
Among others, Apandi (photo) said Najib's RM2.6 billion donation in 2013 came from the Saudi royal family, and of this sum, RM2.03 billion was not used and had been returned.
The timing of the donation was just ahead of the 13th general election, and was during Abdullah's reign.
However, WSJ in its report said some international investigators do not believe this to be the case.
「The US Federal Bureau of Investigation and other government agencies from outside Malaysia continue to investigate the transfer.
「Some international investigators don』t believe the nearly US$700 million came from Saudi Arabia, according to a person familiar with the inquiries,」 the report says.
The report also quoted a former political analyst at the Saudi Embassy in Washington as saying that the idea that the Saudi royalty would donate the vast sum to a personal bank account, instead of a government institution, is "suspect".
「The notion that the Saudi 『royals』 would 『donate』 hundreds of millions of dollars to a foreign leader, as opposed to a government institution, struck me as suspect, to say the least,」 the analyst, Fahad Nazer, is reported as saying.
However, the BBC's Saudi source reportedly said there is nothing unusual about the donation.
He said Jordan, Morocco, Egypt and Sudan have all been multi-hundred-million dollar beneficiaries of Saudi royal funds.
"There is nothing unusual about this donation to Malaysia. It is very similar to how the Saudis operate in a number of countries,」 he was quoted as saying.